Difference between revisions of "Crisis Management"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# [[mitigation]] | # [[mitigation]] | ||
# [[preparedness]] | # [[preparedness]] | ||
− | Different from [[Emergency Management]], Crisis Management has also a long-term strategic aspect. | + | The Netherlands crisis management structure recognises an additional phase: aftercare ('nazorg'), e.g. to take care of the long-term socio-psychological impact to citizens, and to identify and learn the lessons. |
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | Different from [[Emergency Management]], Crisis Management has also a long-term strategic aspect.<br /> | ||
</big> | </big> |
Revision as of 02:34, 19 February 2015
According to securipedia[1], Crisis Management is a continuous process with typically four cyclic phases following a crisis:
The Netherlands crisis management structure recognises an additional phase: aftercare ('nazorg'), e.g. to take care of the long-term socio-psychological impact to citizens, and to identify and learn the lessons.
Different from Emergency Management, Crisis Management has also a long-term strategic aspect.
Contents
Definitions
European Definitions
National Definitions
Estonia
Crisis management is national arrangements that are prepared and implemented by governmental organisations in cooperation with local governments, private enterprise and non-profit organisations in order to guarantee public safety during an emergency.
Germany
Crisis management is the establishment of conceptual, organisational and procedural basis to support the process of restoring a normal state of affairs as quickly as possible after the occurrence of an exceptional situation.[2].
See also
Notes
- ↑ http://securipedia.eu/mediawiki/index.php/Crisis_management_cycle
- ↑ http://www.kritis.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/Kritis/EN/Baseline%20Protection%20Concept.pdf Protection of Critical Infrastructures – Baseline Protection Concept: Recommendation for Companies, BMI.