CTS2-LE Interoperability: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus CTS2-LE
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == RDF and OWL == Modern semantic (web) technologies have its root in mature knowledge representation (KR) methods and techniques. They can be seen as a “We…“)
 
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
  
== RDF and OWL ==
+
== CTS2 ==
 +
=== About CTS2 ===
 +
The Common Terminology Services Version 2 is a joint standardization effort from HL7 and OMG. The objective was to provide a model and specification for discovering, accessing, distributing and updating terminological resources. While HL7 defined the functional model for managing terminology artifacts, OMG mapped this abstract model onto a concrete information model and service interfaces, which again can be bound to various standards (e.g. SOAP, REST, RDF). Even though CTS2 was developed with healthcare use cases in mind, it can as well be used for managing and distributing terminology resources from other domains.
 +
 
 +
For further information on CTS2 see:
 +
* [http://www.omg.org/spec/CTS2/ OMG CTS2 Homepage] (contains links to all published versions of the CTS2 standard)
 +
* [http://de.slideshare.net/cts2/cts2-introduction Introduction to CTS2] (Presentation from Harold Solbrig, Mayo Clinic)
 +
 
 +
=== Use of CTS2 in CTS2-LE ===
 +
CTS2-LE's internal data model is an RDF-Binding to version 1.0 of the CTS2 standard. By this CTS2-LE supports all terminology resources defined in the CTS2 standard and follows the CTS2 service functional model for discovering and sharing these resources.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Interoperability with 3rd-Party Solutions ===
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== RDF ==
 +
=== About RDF ===
 
Modern semantic (web) technologies have its root in mature knowledge representation (KR) methods and techniques. They can be seen as a “Webification” of KR languages such as the Frame Language and Description Logics (DL). In fact, the Resource Description Language (RDF) standard can be considered as a simple frame language as well as a language for semantic nets and OWL has its direct foundation in a certain DL dialect. The semantics of these languages are the theoretical backbone of controlled vocabularies and are widely used to define concrete vocabularies.  
 
Modern semantic (web) technologies have its root in mature knowledge representation (KR) methods and techniques. They can be seen as a “Webification” of KR languages such as the Frame Language and Description Logics (DL). In fact, the Resource Description Language (RDF) standard can be considered as a simple frame language as well as a language for semantic nets and OWL has its direct foundation in a certain DL dialect. The semantics of these languages are the theoretical backbone of controlled vocabularies and are widely used to define concrete vocabularies.  
  
Zeile 6: Zeile 23:
  
 
Another important aspect is the utilization of RDF for storing and querying linked (big) data. So far many RDF stores (Jena TDB, Virtuoso, etc.) are available and able to hold data in the range of several hundred million triples. Compared to object stores and assuming an average number of 10 object attributes, one can easily store and retrieve several million objects. These capabilities would give us the opportunity to “weave” instance nets for arbitrary medical data objects together with referenced vocabularies.
 
Another important aspect is the utilization of RDF for storing and querying linked (big) data. So far many RDF stores (Jena TDB, Virtuoso, etc.) are available and able to hold data in the range of several hundred million triples. Compared to object stores and assuming an average number of 10 object attributes, one can easily store and retrieve several million objects. These capabilities would give us the opportunity to “weave” instance nets for arbitrary medical data objects together with referenced vocabularies.
 +
 +
=== Use of RDF in CTS2-LE ===
 +
=== Interoperability with 3rd-Party Solutions ===
 +
 +
== SPARQL ==
 +
=== About SPARQL ===
 +
=== Use of SPARQL in CTS2-LE ===
 +
=== Interoperability with 3rd-Party Solutions ===
 +
 +
 +
== HL7 FHIR ==
 +
=== About HL7 FHIR ===
 +
=== Use of HL7 FHIR in CTS2-LE ===
 +
=== Interoperability with 3rd-Party Solutions ===

Version vom 5. Juni 2015, 13:56 Uhr

CTS2

About CTS2

The Common Terminology Services Version 2 is a joint standardization effort from HL7 and OMG. The objective was to provide a model and specification for discovering, accessing, distributing and updating terminological resources. While HL7 defined the functional model for managing terminology artifacts, OMG mapped this abstract model onto a concrete information model and service interfaces, which again can be bound to various standards (e.g. SOAP, REST, RDF). Even though CTS2 was developed with healthcare use cases in mind, it can as well be used for managing and distributing terminology resources from other domains.

For further information on CTS2 see:

Use of CTS2 in CTS2-LE

CTS2-LE's internal data model is an RDF-Binding to version 1.0 of the CTS2 standard. By this CTS2-LE supports all terminology resources defined in the CTS2 standard and follows the CTS2 service functional model for discovering and sharing these resources.


Interoperability with 3rd-Party Solutions

RDF

About RDF

Modern semantic (web) technologies have its root in mature knowledge representation (KR) methods and techniques. They can be seen as a “Webification” of KR languages such as the Frame Language and Description Logics (DL). In fact, the Resource Description Language (RDF) standard can be considered as a simple frame language as well as a language for semantic nets and OWL has its direct foundation in a certain DL dialect. The semantics of these languages are the theoretical backbone of controlled vocabularies and are widely used to define concrete vocabularies.

For instance, SNOMED-CT has the expressivity of the OWL EL++ dialect and even LOINC can be proper represented and processed by means of DL. Moreover, methods and techniques beyond representation such as DL-inference, logical rules , and querying via SPARQL are the building blocks for processing vocabularies.

Another important aspect is the utilization of RDF for storing and querying linked (big) data. So far many RDF stores (Jena TDB, Virtuoso, etc.) are available and able to hold data in the range of several hundred million triples. Compared to object stores and assuming an average number of 10 object attributes, one can easily store and retrieve several million objects. These capabilities would give us the opportunity to “weave” instance nets for arbitrary medical data objects together with referenced vocabularies.

Use of RDF in CTS2-LE

Interoperability with 3rd-Party Solutions

SPARQL

About SPARQL

Use of SPARQL in CTS2-LE

Interoperability with 3rd-Party Solutions

HL7 FHIR

About HL7 FHIR

Use of HL7 FHIR in CTS2-LE

Interoperability with 3rd-Party Solutions