Difference between revisions of "Fault Behaviour"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
to the “normal” [[scenario]] behaviour. Fault behaviour may be created “by hand” as other behaviours or with the support of the [[attack tool]] using [[attack tree]]s.}} | to the “normal” [[scenario]] behaviour. Fault behaviour may be created “by hand” as other behaviours or with the support of the [[attack tool]] using [[attack tree]]s.}} | ||
+ | <!--- | ||
=== Other International Definitions === | === Other International Definitions === | ||
− | |||
==== United Nations’ Definition ==== | ==== United Nations’ Definition ==== | ||
− | |||
=== National Definitions === | === National Definitions === | ||
− | |||
==== Country Name==== | ==== Country Name==== | ||
− | |||
===Standard Definition=== | ===Standard Definition=== | ||
− | + | --> | |
== Discussion Topic == | == Discussion Topic == |
Revision as of 14:01, 22 December 2016
Contents
Definitions
European Project Definitions
CIPRNet project
The CIPRNet project [1] uses the following definition:
Fault behaviour describes negative effects to an infrastructure, like attacks or faults.
DIESIS project
The DIESIS project [2] gives the following definition:
The fault behaviour describes negative effects to an infrastructure, like attacks or faults. For the simulation, fault behaviour can be loaded in addition
to the “normal” scenario behaviour. Fault behaviour may be created “by hand” as other behaviours or with the support of the attack tool using attack trees.